Wide Load Funny Glamor Shots Unicorn
20 Of The Most Hilarious Glamour Shots You've Ever Seen
Related Articles
neeranterevell1955.blogspot.com
Source: https://fstoppers.com/humor/20-most-hilarious-glamour-shots-youve-ever-seen-4820
Lorenzo P Jaron Schneider -
0
0
Dario Camacho -
HAHA u cant look cool with cats, thats for sure
0
0
Randy -
Fun images and great inspiration - tempted to find a lot of cats, cartoon track suits and guns. The Die Antwoord shot doesn't belong (in my mind anyway).
0
0
Jayson Carey Randy -
agreed (to the OP, it's the third picture), they do stuff like this on purpose, reveling in the weird. one of their music videos shows a Lady Gaga look-alike giving birth to a giant bug.
0
0
Theodore Randy -
Die Antwoord's photo does not belong in here for sure. That's not even glamour. It's Zef. I'm surprised that a website like fstoppers is not up to date with a music group that has so strong visuals in their videos.
0
0
Jacek Woźniak -
the third one is Die Antwoord, that's their style :)
0
0
Andrew Iverson -
Some of these i think are by the guy who specialized in doing fake bad glamour shots. I know i've seen some of the people before in that context. (not counting Die Antwoord)
0
0
Ed Lau -
The fact that these people exist makes me fear for the future of the human race.
0
0
Lorenzo P Ed Lau -
0
0
Christopher Cooke -
I am so MAD at this post!!!
0
0
Anonymous -
I've been seeing the glam unicorn man all over the net for years. Looks like Richard Simmons having a wet dream whist overdosing on E and cosmopolitans.
0
0
Spy Black -
What makes this glam? Some are attempts at it, but most are simply portraits, with no semblance of glamor styling. Certainly comical, however.
0
0
Martina Zaletel -
I dont see the glamour in that, perhaps a few are attempting to be it, but others are just portraits going crazy.
0
0
Filip Wesołowski -
Please remove Die Antwoord shot (third one). It really doesn't belong here and it's sad it made its way in here, in the first place.
1
0
Benicio Murray -
A lot of these are done tongue-in-cheek on purpose.
Hopefully the author realises this?
0
0
Philipp Blum -
Fun to photoshop your friends faces in
0
0
Hunter Harrison -
Yeah, the Die Antwoord photo definitely doesn't belong. In case you're curious, the photo is by Clayton Cubitt. Definitely check out his (nsfw) photos. He's pretty sweet.
0
0
Dafydd Owen -
Either poking fun at past styles, or not getting tongue in cheek jokes - I'd expect better from Fstoppers.
0
0
Mr Blah Dafydd Owen -
Don't. From judgmental writing to poor reviews while passing through even worse journalistic skills... Don't het your hopes up.
0
0
Dafydd Owen Mr Blah -
It used to be better.
Move to ISO 1200 it is then.
0
0
Kane -
Did anyone else recognize the guy from the "Shoes" and "Muffins" videos? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCF3ywukQYA
0
0
phreak nes -
The 15th one is an Fraser Kilmister better known as Lemmy lead singer for the band Motörhead.
0
0
Grosos Antonio -
Check Die Antwoord actually a really good South African Hip Hop Band... They did that as a pardoy...
0
0
Black Justin Bieber -
These pictures were funny years ago. Leave this stuff to 4chan and Buzzfeed. Please don't stoop to Petapixel level of posting random stupid crap. Post more awesome photography articles and tutorials.
0
0
defense94 Black Justin Bieber -
Random stupid crap? You're the one who's username is "Black Justin Bieber".... This is just a comic relief for photographers bro, chill out.
0
0
trevor williams -
0
0
Lyle Turner -
Unfortunately, a few of these are not old. I almost pissed myself when a friend showed me the one of the guy in the sweater holding his cat with a Santa hat on a dating site in Dallas Texas just a few months ago.
0
0
Mette Laurent Sadic -
Yeah, these aren't "glamour shots" - just really bad photos. Glamour shots are shots from the midt-late 80'ties where women were made over
with heavy make-up, big hair, "sexy clothes" and photographed with a
soft focus lense. And the women were often grabbing their collar. It is a
very specific genre and most of these are not glamour shots per se.
0
0